[mary-users] client Java application

[Ingmar Steiner]

Dear Nikolai,

I don't think the SABLE code has been touched in a while, but with 
version 4.3, Mary added prosody specification support like in SSML 1.1 
(see http://mary.opendfki.de/wiki/ProsodySpecificationSupport). 
Obviously, using actual MaryXML would offer full control over all 
synthesis parameters, but if you're forced to use either SABLE or SSML, 
I would recommend SSML.

Best wishes,

-Ingmar

On 24.02.2012 04:01, Nikolai Kouznetsov wrote:
> Hello, MArc,
>
> Here is a question: which mark-up is better to control MARY TTS performance
> in your opinion: SABLE or SSML. I am just wondering if all tags from these
> to markups have been implemented in AMry TTS.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Nikolai Kouznetsov, PhD
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mary-users mailing list
> Mary-users at dfki.de
> http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/mary-users

-- 
Ingmar Steiner
Postdoctoral Researcher

LORIA Speech Group, Nancy, France
National Institute for Research in
Computer Science and Control (INRIA)