[Rock-dev] Statistics class in base

Jakob Schwendner jakob.schwendner at dfki.de
Mon May 14 11:13:27 CEST 2012


On 05/14/2012 10:58 AM, Alexander Duda wrote:
> On 05/14/2012 10:37 AM, Jakob Schwendner wrote:
>> On 05/14/2012 10:31 AM, Alexander Duda wrote:
>>> On 05/14/2012 10:26 AM, Jakob Schwendner wrote:
>>>> I would rather use a more generic package for now, since it is really
>>>> just a single class that doesn't merit a full package. Maybe
>>>> tools/numeric (including alexes stuff?)
>>>>
>>>> Jakob
>>> There is already a folder for image_processing. Maybe we can put
>>> numeric_tools into this folder for now and rename the folder
>>> image_processing to processing in the long run.
>> I would see numeric_tools as something that could be used by
>> image_processing, but would not be limited to it (e.g. a lot of the
>> packages in slam could benifit). Changing image_processing to processing
>> I am also not a fan of. What's the problem with base/numeric or
>> base/numeric_tools?
> Base is a very generic category therefore if there is any other fitting
> to the proposed package I would go for the latter one. Other than that
> there is nothing wrong with base/numeric(_tools).
I would argue it is as generic as a spline library (which is even in 
base/types).
Unless there are objections maybe you could move your package to 
base/numeric? (which btw, we could also move the sisl stuff to at some 
point).

Jakob



More information about the Rock-dev mailing list