[Rock-dev] Proposal for a Rock website redesign

[Jakob Schwendner]

Hi,

I think the website looks pretty good. Great Work! 
Especially when we replace all those pretty people by even prettier robots
:)

On the subject of Jekyll vs. Webgen, I don't have an oppinion. 
I think it is a matter of if someone is willing to do it. But then again,
maybe when changing the layout, this would be a good point to switch the
engine as well.

A thing that was on my mind for a while though, is maybe to get a Rock logo.


Cheers,

Jakob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: rock-dev-bounces at dfki.de [mailto:rock-dev-bounces at dfki.de] On
> Behalf Of Sylvain Joyeux
> Sent: Freitag, 16. Januar 2015 14:13
> To: rock-dev at dfki.de
> Cc: Tiago Cajahyba
> Subject: [Rock-dev] Proposal for a Rock website redesign
> 
> Cajahyba (from BIR) asked me to put online a redesign proposal for the
Rock
> website. I finally did so (sorry for the long time, Cajahyba !)
> 
> Example front page
>    http://www.jhaampe.org/rock-redesign/
> 
> Example documentation page
>    http://www.jhaampe.org/rock-
> redesign/documentation/introduction/overview.html
> 
> Obviously, before getting into the full-fledged work, we would like to
have
> some feedback ...
> 
> In addition, we were considering whether we should not use this to change
> the website generation tool. I picked webgen at the time before it looked
> really the best (given the constraint that one should be able to generate
and
> browse the documentation offline). These days, especially given that we
are
> now on github, jekyll took a lot of steam (and is IMO a lot better than
> webgen). We would appreciate some thoughts on the matter as well ...
> 
> Sylvain
> _______________________________________________
> Rock-dev mailing list
> Rock-dev at dfki.de
> http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/rock-dev