[mary-dev] [mary-users] Labelling gaps
Jerome Perri
jerome.perri at hotmail.com
Mon Oct 1 12:44:30 CEST 2012
Hi Asif,
that is a very good explanation, I agree with it.
Thank you.
Jerome
From: bizpole at hotmail.ca
To: jerome.perri at hotmail.com; ingmar.steiner at ucd.ie; mary-dev at dfki.de; mary-users at dfki.de
Subject: Re: [mary-users] [mary-dev] Labelling gaps
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:22:39 -0400
Hello Jerome,
I am not expert but I will try to explain it by
logic.
I will assume it as a syllable pause.(Phonetic
Pause)
The gap or pause between HO
and TEL is due to syllables of this word.
HO is 1st block and TEL
is 2nd block of this disyllable word, HO is said completely 1st and
as one block while a pause came before TEL to make a
complete word, TEL caused a gap between both blocks, so in my
opinion gap/pause should be labeled
as a part of T.
Thanks
Asif Mir
From: Jerome Perri
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 6:49 AM
To: ingmar.steiner at ucd.ie ; mary-dev at dfki.de ; mary-users at dfki.de
Subject: [mary-users] [mary-dev] Labelling gaps
Hello!
I would like to ask what the rules for labelling are
for cases where there is a gap.
For example in a word like "hotel":
It
is likely that the speaker made a small pause betwee the "o" and the
"t".
Should the gap/pause be labelled as a part of the "o" or as a part of
"t"?
Thank you!
Jerome
_______________________________________________
Mary-users mailing
list
Mary-users at dfki.de
http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/mary-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.dfki.de/pipermail/mary-dev/attachments/20121001/c1778023/attachment.htm
More information about the Mary-dev
mailing list