Publication
Qualitative reasoning about convex relations
Dominik Lücke; Till Mossakowski; Diedrich Wolter
In: Christian Freksa; Nora S. Newcombe; Peter Gärdenfors; Stefan Wölfl (Hrsg.). Spatial Cognition VI. Learning, Reasoning, and Talking about Space. International Conference Spatial Cognition (Spatial Cognition-08), September 15-19, Freiburg, Germany, Pages 426-440, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5248, ISBN 978-3-540-87600-7, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008.
Abstract
Various calculi have been designed for qualitative constraint-based representation and reasoning. Especially for orientation calculi, it happens that the well-known method of algebraic closure cannot decide consistency of constraint networks, even when considering networks over base relations (= scenarios) only. We show that this is the case for all relative orientation calculi capable of distinguishing between "left of" and "right of". Indeed, for these calculi, it is not clear whether efficient (i.e. polynomial) algorithms deciding scenario-consistency exist. As a partial solution of this problem, we present a technique to decide global consistency in qualitative calculi. It is applicable to all calculi that employ convex base relations over the real-valued space R^n and it can be performed in polynomial time when dealing with convex relations only. Since global consistency implies consistency, this can be an efficient aid for identifying consistent scenarios. This complements the method of algebraic closure which can identify a subset of inconsistent scenarios.